Posted on April 10, 2015
Should I File a Complaint Against A Police Officer?
Law enforcement personnel are public servants employed to “protective and serve” society from crime. However, there are instances where persons fall victim to unlawful experiences with patrol officers, detectives, or sheriff’s deputies. Law enforcement officers depend substantially on the number of arrests leading to swift convictions for career advancement within their department. Thus, there’s an incentive for a police officer to violate one’s constitutional rights in an effort to convict them later on in order to be promoted within their department – e.g., advancing from a patrol unit to homicide detective.
If a member of the public simply ignores a police officer’s unconstitutional acts without filing a complaint, the police officer will eventually carry the same conduct when they’re promoted and subject other members of the public with the same unlawful scrutiny.
There has been, more than ever, a growing concern over police officer misconduct around the United States mainly due to citizens capturing via mobile device these illegal performances of officers beating and shooting unarmed suspects. It’s without a doubt that video evidence does not lie and often contradicts a police officer’s explanation for his or her acts. Yet government agencies still don’t pursue criminal perjury charges. In a recent media article, police departments around the country united to actually ask the public to stop recording them because it’s “making us [police officers] look bad.” Why would police departments ask the public to stop recording them? Probably because the public is now acknowledging the concern over law enforcement misconduct making the public second guess the departments who swear to “protect and serve.”
Filing a complaint against a police officer is substantially useful to those who have been victimized by unconstitutional misconduct and are now facing criminal charges. If a criminal defendant alleges police officer misconduct, they may file a trial court motion to unseal the personnel records of a police officer. A criminal defense attorney may review a complaint filed by someone and find it useful to their defense. For instance, a defense attorney may be arguing the police officer lied stating the suspect “consented” to search their vehicle where a bag of drugs was discovered. When an attorney obtains a complaint, an often multiple, it may be useful in convincing the court that since the officer engaged in similar fashions of fabricating consent, it likely occurred under the current case. At times, individuals who have filed complaints may be asked to testify as to their experiences with that particular officer.
It should be duly noted that a police officer is unaware of the fact someone files a complaint against them nor are they permitted access or review of any complaints filed against them. Instead, obtaining a police officer’s personnel complaints take a court order that is more challenging and burdensome than one would expect – something only attorneys, not police officers, can obtain.
Dan is arrested for possession of marijuana. Dan alleges the police officer searched his car without any probable cause and over his objection. Dan explains to his attorney what happened and his attorney files a motion to unseal public complaints particularly those who similarly complained about an unlawful search. The judge grants the motion and turns over 3 individuals who filed a complaint against the same officer all being subjected to an unlawful search. Dan’s attorney contacts those individuals who all say the same thing and identical to Dan’s case. In this case, these 3 individuals would be useful for Dan’s defense of an unlawful search because they would testify that the police officer unlawfully searched their vehicle which would question the police officer’s credibility as a witness against Dan. Additionally, this is useful because a police officer almost always does not record anything therefore the evidence hinges on the police officers word over Dan’s.
Common Subjects of a Complaint
• Unlawful Search & Seizure
• Excessive Force
• Planting Evidence
• Fabricating Statements / Evidence
• Threats / Coercion
Contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney John Rogers
For more information or if you have been victimized by law enforcement, contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney John Rogers at the Law Offices of John D. Rogers. Mr. Rogers is located at 1801 Century Park East, 24th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067. Call 877-888-9820 for a free consultation. Mr. Rogers is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.