Navigating Legal Protections: The Difference Between a DVRO and CHRO

In the pursuit of safety and peace, individuals facing threats, abuse, or harassment have legal avenues available to them in Orange County. Two significant protective measures are the Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) and the Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHRO). While both serve the crucial purpose of providing protection, they cater to different situations, governed by the nature of the relationship between the parties involved and the evidentiary standards required for obtaining these orders.

Understanding DVROs: A Family Law Perspective

DVROs fall under the umbrella of family law, emphasizing the personal and intimate nature of the relationships they cover. These orders are designed to protect individuals from abuse by someone with whom they share a familial or intimate relationship, such as spouses, domestic partners, parents, siblings, or intimate partners. The inclusivity of this definition reflects an understanding of the complex dynamics of domestic and intimate relationships and the specific forms of abuse that can arise within them.

In Orange County, DVRO petitions are filed at the Lamoreaux Justice Center, a courthouse that handles family law and juvenile matters. One of the key aspects of DVROs is their evidentiary standard—preponderance of the evidence. This standard requires the petitioner to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that the abuse occurred, which is considered a lower threshold of proof, facilitating access to protection for those in vulnerable situations.

CHROs: Addressing a Wider Range of Threats

Conversely, CHROs address situations where the parties may not have a close personal relationship but are instead neighbors, co-workers, acquaintances, or even strangers. This type of order is crucial for individuals facing harassment, stalking, or threats from someone outside their immediate social or familial circle.

CHRO petitions are processed at the Central Justice Center in Santa Ana, reflecting the civil nature of these disputes. The evidentiary standard for a CHRO is clear and convincing evidence, which is significantly higher than that for a DVRO. This standard requires the petitioner to prove that their claim is highly and substantially more probable to be true than not. This higher burden of proof underscores the challenges in obtaining a CHRO, given the potentially less direct nature of the relationship between the petitioner and the respondent.

The Evidentiary Burden and Its Impact

The difference in evidentiary standards between DVROs and CHROs highlights a critical aspect of the legal process for obtaining protection. The preponderance of the evidence standard for DVROs acknowledges the inherent risks and challenges faced by those experiencing domestic abuse, facilitating a more accessible path to protection. In contrast, the clear and convincing evidence standard for CHROs reflects the need for a higher degree of proof when the relationship between the parties does not involve intimate or familial ties, ensuring that such orders are granted based on substantial evidence of harassment or threat.

Conclusion

Understanding the distinctions between DVROs and CHROs is crucial for individuals seeking legal protection against abuse, harassment, or threats in Orange County. Whether navigating the complexities of family law at the Lamoreaux Justice Center or addressing civil harassment at the Central Justice Center in Santa Ana, the nature of the relationship and the required level of proof are key factors in determining the most appropriate and effective legal recourse. By recognizing these differences, individuals can better navigate their options and pursue the necessary steps toward safety and peace.

Contact Us to Schedule a Consultation

If you’re seeking to file a restraining order or an order has been served against you, then contact us today to speak with an experienced Orange County restraining order attorney.