Asserting Self-Defense to Resisting Arrest Under Penal Code 148(a)(1)

July 8, 2024

Facing charges of resisting arrest can be daunting and complex, especially under California Penal Code 148(a)(1) pc. This statute criminalizes willfully resisting, delaying, or obstructing a peace officer or emergency medical technician in the performance of their duties. However, there are circumstances where asserting a self-defense claim is both valid and necessary, particularly when law enforcement officers use unreasonable force or deviate from standard protocols. This article explores the nuances of asserting self-defense in resisting arrest cases, the legal framework, and related offenses under Penal Code 69.

Understanding Penal Code 148(a)(1)

California Penal Code 148(a)(1) specifically addresses the act of resisting arrest. To secure a conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove:

  1. Intentional Act: The defendant willfully resisted, delayed, or obstructed a peace officer.
  2. Knowledge: The defendant knew, or reasonably should have known, that the person they were resisting was a peace officer performing their duties.
  3. Lawful Performance: The officer was lawfully performing their duties at the time of the alleged resistance.

Asserting Self-Defense: Unreasonable Force and Deviations from Protocol

Self-defense can be a viable defense to resisting arrest charges when an officer uses unreasonable force or deviates from standard law enforcement protocols. Key elements of asserting self-defense in these cases include:

  1. Unreasonable Force:
    • Law enforcement officers are permitted to use reasonable force to effect an arrest. However, if an officer uses excessive or unreasonable force, the individual being arrested has the right to defend themselves. This principle is grounded in the legal notion that no one has to submit to unlawful acts, even if those acts are committed by a police officer.
  1. Deviation from Protocol:
    • Police officers are required to follow established protocols during arrests. Deviations from these protocols that result in unnecessary harm or risk can justify a self-defense claim. Examples include failing to identify themselves as police officers or using aggressive tactics that escalate the situation without cause.

Legal Framework for Self-Defense Claims

To assert self-defense against a resisting arrest charge, certain criteria must be met:

  1. Imminent Threat:
    • The defendant must reasonably believe they are in imminent danger of suffering bodily injury or unlawful restraint.
  1. Proportional Response:
    • The force used in self-defense must be proportional to the threat faced. Excessive force beyond what is necessary to protect oneself can undermine the self-defense claim.
  1. Immediate Action:
    • The defendant’s response must be immediate and not premeditated. The defense must show that the actions were taken in direct response to the officer’s use of unreasonable force.

Related Offense: Penal Code 69

Penal Code 69 addresses resisting an officer with force or violence, which is a more serious offense than 148(a)(1). To convict under this statute, the prosecution must prove that the defendant attempted to deter or prevent an officer from performing their duties using threat or violence. Self-defense can also be a valid defense under Penal Code 69 if the force used was in response to unreasonable actions by the officer.

Challenges in Asserting Self-Defense

  1. Officer Reports:
    • Officers often write reports that protect themselves from civil or criminal liability, especially if the suspect is injured and requires hospitalization. These reports may omit or distort facts to justify the officer’s actions and paint the defendant as the aggressor.
  1. Medical Evidence:
    • When a suspect is hospitalized, medical records become critical. Injuries documented by medical professionals can corroborate claims of excessive force and support a self-defense argument.
  1. Witness Testimonies:
    • Eyewitnesses, including bystanders and other officers, can provide valuable testimony. Their accounts can either support or contradict the defendant’s and the officer’s versions of events.
  1. Body Camera Footage:
    • Increasingly, body camera footage is becoming essential in these cases. Reviewing this footage can provide an objective view of the incident and help establish whether the officer’s use of force was reasonable.

Building a Strong Self-Defense Case

  1. Gathering Evidence:
    • Collecting all available evidence is crucial. This includes witness statements, medical records, photographs of injuries, and any available video footage.
  1. Expert Testimonies:
    • Expert witnesses, such as use-of-force experts, can analyze the situation and provide professional opinions on whether the officer’s actions were reasonable.
  1. Legal Representation:
    • An experienced criminal defense attorney is essential in navigating the complexities of asserting self-defense. They can help gather evidence, question witnesses, and present a compelling case in court.
  1. Challenge Officer Credibility:
    • Questioning the credibility of the officer’s report and testimony can be pivotal. Highlighting inconsistencies, previous complaints, or misconduct records can weaken the prosecution’s case.

Contact Us to Schedule a Consultation for Resisting Arrest Charges

Asserting self-defense in response to resisting arrest charges under Penal Code 148(a)(1) is a complex but viable strategy, especially when law enforcement officers use unreasonable force or deviate from standard protocols. Understanding the legal framework, gathering substantial evidence, and having experienced legal representation are crucial steps in building a strong defense.

If you are facing charges of resisting arrest, contact the Law Offices of John D. Rogers to schedule a consultation with an experienced Orange County criminal defense attorney. With a thorough understanding of self-defense claims and a commitment to protecting your rights, John D. Rogers can provide the legal support you need to navigate this challenging situation.

Related PC 148(a)(1) Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


eight − = 1

In the Media
abc 7 kcal 2 kcal 9 LA Weekly Los Angeles Times NBC

Contact Us For A Free Case Evaluation

(949) 625-4487
4000 MacArthur Blvd. East Tower Suite 615 Newport Beach, CA 92660

Contact Us

24 Hour Response Time