How Padilla v. Kentucky Changed the Obligations of Criminal Defense Attorneys

January 29, 2023

Padilla v. Kentucky was a landmark Supreme Court case that fundamentally changed the obligations of criminal defense attorneys to their noncitizen clients. Prior to this ruling, there was a lack of clarity and consistency among lower courts as to whether defense attorneys had a constitutional obligation to advise their noncitizen clients of the potential immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a crime. In Padilla, the Supreme Court held that defense attorneys must now advise their noncitizen clients of the potential deportation risks associated with a guilty plea, and failure to do so can result in a violation of the Sixth Amendment’s right to effective assistance of counsel.

The case involved a lawful permanent resident of the United States named José Padilla, who was charged with drug trafficking. His defense attorney did not inform him that a guilty plea would likely result in his deportation, and Padilla pleaded guilty. After serving his sentence, he was placed into deportation proceedings and argued that his attorney’s failure to advise him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel. The Supreme Court ultimately agreed with Padilla, stating that the deportation consequences of a criminal conviction are “uniquely severe” and “practically inevitable” for noncitizens and that the failure to advise a noncitizen client of these consequences “deprives the defendant of the effective assistance of counsel.”

This ruling has had a significant impact on the criminal justice system. Prior to Padilla, many defense attorneys did not advise their noncitizen clients of the potential immigration consequences of a guilty plea, either because they were unaware of the consequences or because they believed that it was not their responsibility. Padilla made it clear that defense attorneys must now advise their noncitizen clients of the potential deportation risks associated with a guilty plea, and failure to do so can result in a violation of the Sixth Amendment’s right to effective assistance of counsel.

Padilla also highlights the need for defense attorneys to be more knowledgeable about immigration law. Prior to this ruling, many defense attorneys had little or no experience with immigration law, and were therefore unable to advise their noncitizen clients of the potential immigration consequences of a guilty plea. Padilla has increased the pressure on defense attorneys to become more familiar with immigration law and to be able to provide accurate and relevant advice to their noncitizen clients.

The ruling has also had an impact on the plea bargaining process. Prior to Padilla, many noncitizen defendants were not informed of the potential immigration consequences of a guilty plea and therefore unknowingly pleaded guilty to a crime that would result in their deportation. Padilla has made it clear that defense attorneys must now advise their noncitizen clients of the potential deportation risks associated with a guilty plea, and this has given noncitizen defendants more information and power in the plea bargaining process.

It’s important to note that Padilla only applies to noncitizen defendants. The court did not extend the same level of protection to citizens, but rather citizens have different rights and protections, so it’s important for criminal defense attorneys to be aware of the different rights for citizens and noncitizens.

If you’ve been charged with a crime, then contact the Law Offices of John D. Rogers. Call us today to schedule a free confidential consultation with an experienced Orange County criminal defense attorney.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


− one = 8

In the Media
abc 7 kcal 2 kcal 9 LA Weekly Los Angeles Times NBC

Contact Us For A Free Case Evaluation

(949) 625-4487
4000 MacArthur Blvd. East Tower Suite 615 Newport Beach, CA 92660

Contact Us

24 Hour Response Time